← Back to Bills
HR 63105th CongressSigned into LawHouse

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley project, California, as "Trinity Lake".

Policy Area: Water Resources Development
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Mar 24, 2026
Latest Action Date
Sep 30, 1997

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 105-44.

Official Summary

Redesignates Clair Engle Lake, the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley project, California, as Trinity Lake.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, enacted as Public Law No: 105-44, officially redesignates the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in California's Central Valley project from Clair Engle Lake to Trinity Lake. The change is a formal renaming and does not include provisions for altering the reservoir's management, operations, or funding. The bill was introduced in the House during the 105th Congress and has been signed into law.

Bottom Line

The bill legally changes the name of the reservoir behind Trinity Dam to Trinity Lake, formalizing a new designation without affecting other aspects of the reservoir or dam operations.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • Redesignates Clair Engle Lake as Trinity Lake, the reservoir formed by Trinity Dam in California.
  • The bill pertains solely to the official naming and does not address water resource management or infrastructure changes.
  • The bill was passed by Congress and signed into law on September 30, 1997.
Who Benefits?

['Federal and state agencies responsible for water resource management in California, such as the Bureau of Reclamation and California Department of Water Resources.', 'Local governments and communities around the reservoir who may use the official name for identification and promotional purposes.', 'Recreational users and tourism sectors that reference the reservoir.']

Potential Concerns

['No direct implementation or funding provisions are included, so administrative updates to maps, signage, and documents may be required.', 'Potential costs associated with updating official records and materials to reflect the new name.', 'No oversight or enforcement mechanisms are specified, as the bill is limited to renaming.']

Political Context

The bill was introduced and passed during the 105th Congress and reflects a formal administrative action to rename a federal water resource feature. It fits within the broader policy area of Water Resources Development but does not engage with water management policy or funding decisions.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Updating maps, signage, and official documents to reflect the new name may improve clarity and consistency in communication about the reservoir.', 'Local tourism and recreational activities may benefit from a clearer or more recognizable reservoir name.', 'Potential minor administrative burden on agencies to coordinate the renaming process.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The bill is straightforward in its purpose to rename a reservoir and does not include additional policy or funding provisions. Transparency considerations focus on ensuring that administrative agencies update all relevant materials to avoid confusion. Oversight mechanisms are not specified, so monitoring the implementation of the name change relies on standard agency procedures.

Passage Likelihood: HighConfidence: 95%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready