A bill to amend the Act establishing Women's Rights National Historical Park to permit the Secretary of the Interior to acquire title in fee simple to the Hunt House located in Waterloo, New York.
Latest Action
Became Public Law No: 106-258.
Official Summary
Amends Federal law establishing the Women's Rights National Historic Park in Seneca Falls and Waterloo, New York, to repeal provisions which: (1) prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from acquiring a fee simple interest in the Bloomer and Hunt Houses in Waterloo; and (2) require the Secretary, within two years after acquisition, to remove all structures from the property of the McClintock House in Waterloo that are not relevant to its historic integrity.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™This bill amends the law establishing the Women's Rights National Historic Park in Seneca Falls and Waterloo, New York. It removes restrictions that prevented the Secretary of the Interior from acquiring full ownership of the Bloomer and Hunt Houses in Waterloo. Additionally, it repeals the requirement to remove non-historic structures from the McClintock House property within two years of acquisition.
The bill allows the Secretary of the Interior to acquire full ownership of certain historic properties within the Women's Rights National Historic Park, potentially aiding preservation efforts.
- Repeals prohibition on the Secretary of the Interior acquiring fee simple title to the Bloomer and Hunt Houses in Waterloo, New York.
- Removes the mandate to remove all non-historic structures from the McClintock House property within two years after acquisition.
- Amends existing federal law related to the Women's Rights National Historic Park to facilitate property acquisition and management.
The National Park Service and the Department of the Interior may benefit by gaining greater authority to manage and preserve historic properties. Visitors and historians interested in women's rights history may also benefit from improved preservation of these sites.
Potential concerns include the costs and resources required for property acquisition and maintenance. The repeal of the removal requirement for non-historic structures could affect the historic integrity or appearance of the McClintock House property. The full bill text is not provided, limiting detailed analysis of implementation specifics.
The bill originated in the Senate during the 106th Congress and was signed into law on August 8, 2000. It falls under the policy area of Public Lands and Natural Resources and reflects legislative action to amend existing historic preservation laws.
No hidden impact flags detected
GovScope reviewed 11 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
By allowing fee simple acquisition of historic properties, the bill may facilitate more comprehensive preservation and management efforts, potentially enhancing educational and cultural value. However, changes in property management requirements could affect local land use or maintenance practices.
The full bill text is not available, limiting detailed analysis of provisions and potential costs. Citizens interested in historic preservation or local land management may want to review how property acquisition and maintenance responsibilities are handled following this amendment.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.