← Back to Bills
HR 3858107th CongressSigned into LawHouse

New River Gorge Boundary Act of 2002

Policy Area: Public Lands and Natural Resources
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Mar 24, 2026
Latest Action Date
Dec 17, 2002

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 107-356.

Official Summary

New River Gorge Boundary Act of 2002 - Amends the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to modify the boundaries of the New River Gorge National River in West Virginia.Directs the Secretary of the Interior to complete a land exchange in the vicinity of Beauty Mountain in Fayette County to acquire specified land that lies adjacent to the River's boundary (to be included in the boundaries and administered as part of the River) in exchange for specified land located within such boundary (to be excluded from the River).

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

The New River Gorge Boundary Act of 2002 modifies the boundaries of the New River Gorge National River in West Virginia by directing a land exchange near Beauty Mountain in Fayette County. This exchange involves acquiring land adjacent to the river boundary to be included within the park and removing specified land within the current boundary. The bill amends the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to effect these changes.

Bottom Line

This bill adjusts the boundaries of the New River Gorge National River through a land exchange to better define and manage the park area.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • Amends the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 to change the New River Gorge National River boundaries.
  • Directs the Secretary of the Interior to complete a land exchange near Beauty Mountain in Fayette County, West Virginia.
  • Includes newly acquired land within the park boundary and excludes certain land currently within the boundary.
Who Benefits?

Federal land management agencies, such as the National Park Service, may benefit from clearer and potentially more manageable park boundaries. Local communities and visitors could experience changes in land use or access depending on the land exchange outcomes.

Potential Concerns

The bill does not provide details on the environmental, economic, or social impacts of the land exchange. Implementation may involve logistical challenges in land management and coordination with local stakeholders. Costs associated with the land exchange are not specified.

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the House during the 107th Congress, falls under the Public Lands and Natural Resources policy area, and has passed into law as Public Law No: 107-356 as of December 17, 2002.

Hidden Impact Review

No hidden impact flags detected

GovScope reviewed 11 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

Clear Review
Categories Reviewed — Not Detected
Broad agency authority
New regulatory authority
Privacy concerns
Spending increases
Criminal penalties
Civil liability
Unfunded mandates
Executive discretion
Missing sunset provisions
Cross references
Hidden implementation costs
Indirect Effects

Adjusting park boundaries may affect land management practices, local land use, and conservation efforts. It could influence visitor access and resource allocation within the park.

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The full bill text is not provided, limiting detailed analysis. Citizens may want to review the specific land parcels involved and any environmental assessments related to the land exchange. Monitoring implementation outcomes could be important for understanding local impacts.

Passage Likelihood: HighConfidence: 75%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready