← Back to Bills
S 144108th CongressSigned into LawSenate

Noxious Weed Control and Eradication Act of 2004

Policy Area: Public Lands and Natural Resources
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Mar 24, 2026
Latest Action Date
Oct 30, 2004

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 108-412.

Official Summary

Noxious Weed Control Act of 2003 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior, with appropriate consultation, to establish a program to provide to eligible weed management entities financial assistance for use in controlling or eradicating noxious weeds through States, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories (States).Lists factors the Secretary shall consider in decisions to allocate funding to States, including the severity or potential severity of the noxious weed problem to be addressed by a State. Requires the Secretary to provide special consideration for States that have approved weed management entities established by Indian tribes.Sets forth eligible activities funds disbursed under this Act can be used for, including: (1) applied research to solve locally significant weed management problems; and (2) projects and activities relating to the control or eradication of noxious weeds, including education.Lists selection criteria by which States shall choose projects to which to award funds under this Act.Sets the maximum Federal share of the cost of any project approved by a State or Indian tribe under this Act at 50 percent, with certain exceptions.Sets limitations on the use of funds disbursed under this Act, including that none be used for projects to control or eradicate animals, pests, or submerged or floating noxious aquatic weeds.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to establish a program providing financial assistance to eligible entities for controlling or eradicating noxious weeds across states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. It outlines criteria for funding allocation, including special consideration for tribal weed management entities, and specifies eligible activities such as applied research and education. The federal share of project costs is generally limited to 50 percent, and funds cannot be used for controlling animals, pests, or certain aquatic weeds.

Bottom Line

The bill creates a federally supported program to help states and tribes manage and reduce noxious weed problems, aiming to protect natural resources and public lands.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • Establishes a financial assistance program for noxious weed control and eradication.
  • Includes criteria for funding allocation, emphasizing severity of weed problems and tribal involvement.
  • Limits federal funding to 50 percent of project costs and restricts fund use to specific weed-related activities.
Who Benefits?

States, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, Indian tribes with approved weed management entities, and eligible weed management organizations may benefit from financial support to address noxious weed issues.

Potential Concerns

The bill does not provide details on total funding levels or long-term funding commitments, which could affect program sustainability. Implementation may require coordination among multiple agencies and entities. Restrictions on fund use exclude certain pest and aquatic weed control, potentially limiting flexibility.

Political Context

Passed by the Senate and enacted into law in 2004, this bill falls under the Public Lands and Natural Resources policy area and reflects legislative action to address environmental and land management concerns related to invasive plant species.

Hidden Impact Review

No hidden impact flags detected

GovScope reviewed 11 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

Clear Review
Categories Reviewed — Not Detected
Broad agency authority
New regulatory authority
Privacy concerns
Spending increases
Criminal penalties
Civil liability
Unfunded mandates
Executive discretion
Missing sunset provisions
Cross references
Hidden implementation costs
Indirect Effects

The program may encourage states and tribes to develop more coordinated and effective weed management strategies, potentially benefiting ecosystems and agriculture. However, limitations on fund use could affect the scope of control efforts.

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The full bill text is not provided, limiting detailed analysis. Citizens may want to review funding levels, program oversight, and coordination mechanisms. Monitoring how funds are allocated and used could be important for transparency and effectiveness.

Passage Likelihood: HighConfidence: 75%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready