← Back to Bills
HR 6524110th CongressSigned into LawHouse

To authorize the Administrator of General Services to take certain actions with respect to parcels of real property located in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota, and for other purposes.

Policy Area: Public Lands and Natural Resources
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Jun 6, 2025
Latest Action Date
Oct 15, 2008

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 110-427.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, enacted as Public Law No: 110-427, authorizes the Administrator of General Services to undertake specific actions concerning parcels of real property located in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota. While the exact actions are not detailed in the available summary or full text, the legislation pertains to management or disposition of federal real property within these locations. The law falls under the policy area of Public Lands and Natural Resources and was passed by the House in the 110th Congress and subsequently signed into law on October 15, 2008.

Bottom Line

The law grants authority to the General Services Administrator regarding certain federal properties in Ohio and Minnesota, affecting public land management in those areas.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • Authorizes the Administrator of General Services to take actions related to specific real property parcels in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota.
  • The bill was introduced in the House during the 110th Congress and became law on October 15, 2008.
  • Falls under the policy area of Public Lands and Natural Resources, indicating a focus on federal land management.
Who Benefits?

['General Services Administration (GSA) as the implementing agency', 'Local governments or communities in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota', 'Potentially private sector entities or organizations involved in property transactions or development']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of detailed public information on the specific actions authorized may complicate oversight and transparency.', 'Potential costs or resource allocations required by the General Services Administration to implement the authorized actions are not specified.', 'The scope of authority granted and any limitations or oversight mechanisms are not detailed in the available data.']

Political Context

The bill was considered and passed during the 110th Congress and signed into law in 2008. It addresses federal property management, a common legislative area involving the General Services Administration and local jurisdictions. No additional legislative history or debate details are provided.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Potential changes in local land use or development patterns in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota, depending on the nature of the authorized actions.', 'Possible administrative or budgetary impacts on the General Services Administration related to managing or disposing of the specified properties.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of the full bill text and a detailed summary limits transparency and public understanding of the specific authorities and responsibilities granted. Oversight entities may face challenges in monitoring implementation without clear definitions of the actions authorized. Future disclosures or documentation would be necessary to fully assess the law's impact and compliance.

Passage Likelihood: HighConfidence: 75%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready