← Back to Bills
HR 1595111th CongressSigned into LawHouse

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, as the "Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building".

Policy Area: Government Operations and Politics
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Apr 7, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jun 19, 2009

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 111-29.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill designates the United States Postal Service facility located at 3245 Latta Road in Rochester, New York, as the "Brian K. Schramm Post Office Building." The bill was introduced in the House during the 111th Congress and has since become Public Law No: 111-29 as of June 19, 2009. There is no additional summary or full text available for further details.

Bottom Line

The bill officially names a USPS facility in Rochester, New York, after Brian K. Schramm, recognizing his legacy through this designation.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill pertains to the naming of a USPS facility at a specific address in Rochester, New York.
  • It became Public Law No: 111-29 on June 19, 2009.
  • No further legislative text or summary details are provided.
Who Benefits?

The primary beneficiaries are the local community in Rochester, New York, and potentially the family or associates of Brian K. Schramm, as the designation serves as a form of recognition. The USPS facility itself is the subject of the naming but does not receive operational changes.

Potential Concerns

There is no information on costs or implementation details, but naming a federal facility may involve minor administrative expenses. No policy or regulatory changes are indicated. The status is marked as Withdrawn, which may reflect procedural or legislative considerations not detailed here.

Political Context

The bill falls under the policy area of Government Operations and Politics and originated in the House during the 111th Congress. Despite being marked Withdrawn, it ultimately became law, indicating it passed through the legislative process. Such naming bills are typically non-controversial and symbolic.

Hidden Impact Review

No hidden impact flags detected

GovScope reviewed 11 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

Clear Review
Categories Reviewed — Not Detected
Broad agency authority
New regulatory authority
Privacy concerns
Spending increases
Criminal penalties
Civil liability
Unfunded mandates
Executive discretion
Missing sunset provisions
Cross references
Hidden implementation costs
Indirect Effects

The designation may enhance local community identity or honor the individual named, potentially influencing community pride or historical recognition. There are no visible downstream regulatory or operational effects.

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits detailed analysis. The bill’s status as Withdrawn contrasts with its becoming law, which may warrant further review for procedural clarity. Citizens interested in the naming process or the individual honored may seek additional context from local or congressional records.

Passage Likelihood: UnknownConfidence: 75%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready