Expressing disapproval of the withdrawal by the Secretary of the Interior of approximately 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota, from disposition under the United States mineral and geothermal leasing laws.
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 758.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™This House Concurrent Resolution (H.Con.Res. 34) expresses disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior's decision to withdraw approximately 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands located in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota, from availability under the United States mineral and geothermal leasing laws. The resolution addresses the policy decision to restrict mineral and geothermal leasing activities on these federal lands, reflecting congressional concern over the withdrawal action. The bill does not include detailed legislative text or provisions beyond the expression of disapproval.
H.Con.Res. 34 formally opposes the Secretary of the Interior's withdrawal of a large area of Minnesota National Forest lands from mineral and geothermal leasing, signaling congressional disagreement with this executive action.
- The resolution covers about 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands in three Minnesota counties: Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis.
- It specifically addresses the withdrawal of these lands from disposition under federal mineral and geothermal leasing laws.
- The bill is a concurrent resolution expressing disapproval rather than enacting new law or regulatory changes.
['National Forest System management agencies potentially benefit from clearer congressional feedback on land use decisions.', 'Stakeholders in mineral and geothermal leasing industries may be affected by the expressed congressional stance.', 'Local communities in the affected Minnesota counties may experience indirect benefits or impacts depending on future land use policies.']
["The resolution does not provide binding authority to reverse the Secretary of the Interior's withdrawal decision, limiting its direct policy impact.", 'Lack of detailed legislative text or implementation mechanisms may reduce clarity on next steps or enforcement.', 'Potential tradeoffs exist between conservation goals and resource development interests on the withdrawn lands.']
This resolution arises within the broader context of federal land management and energy policy debates, particularly concerning the balance between resource development and conservation on public lands. The action reflects congressional oversight of executive decisions related to mineral and geothermal leasing on National Forest lands. The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and was placed on the Union Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without passage.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['The resolution may influence future executive or congressional actions regarding land withdrawals and leasing policies on National Forest lands.', 'It could affect stakeholder negotiations and public discourse about balancing energy development and conservation in Minnesota.', 'The expression of disapproval might impact administrative priorities or prompt additional oversight hearings.']
The absence of full bill text and a formal summary limits transparency and comprehensive public understanding of the resolution's implications. As a non-binding concurrent resolution, it serves primarily as a formal statement of congressional opinion rather than enforceable policy, highlighting the importance of clear communication about the scope and limits of such legislative instruments.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.