← Back to Bills
HJRES 124118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to "Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions".

Policy Area: Finance and Financial Sector
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Aug 25, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jul 30, 2024

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 515.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

House Joint Resolution 124 (HJRES 124) from the 118th Congress is a legislative measure aimed at disapproving a rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) titled "Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions." The resolution seeks to use the congressional disapproval process under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to nullify this OCC rule. The rule itself relates to how large financial institutions should manage risks associated with climate change. The resolution was introduced in the House and placed on the Union Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without becoming law. No official bill summary or full text is available to provide further detail on the specific provisions or arguments within the resolution.

Bottom Line

HJRES 124 was a House resolution intended to reject an OCC rule on climate-related financial risk management for large banks, but it did not pass and is no longer active.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The resolution targets a specific OCC rule concerning climate-related financial risk management for large financial institutions.
  • It uses the congressional disapproval mechanism under chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code, which allows Congress to nullify federal agency rules.
  • The resolution was placed on the Union Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without enactment.
Who Benefits?

["Large financial institutions subject to OCC regulation may benefit from the resolution's disapproval of the climate risk management rule, as it would prevent the rule's implementation.", 'The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as the issuing agency, is a key stakeholder in the regulatory process affected by this resolution.']

Potential Concerns

["The lack of available full text and official summary limits understanding of the resolution's detailed provisions and implications.", 'Disapproval of the OCC rule could affect regulatory oversight of climate-related financial risks, potentially impacting financial stability considerations.', 'Use of the congressional disapproval process may raise questions about the balance of authority between Congress and federal agencies in financial regulation.']

Political Context

HJRES 124 was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress as part of a broader legislative effort to challenge or overturn federal agency rules related to climate risk management in the financial sector. The resolution reflects ongoing debates about the role of federal financial regulators in addressing climate change risks. Its placement on the Union Calendar indicates it was scheduled for consideration but it ultimately failed or expired, meaning it did not advance to become law.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['If enacted, the resolution could reduce regulatory requirements on large banks regarding climate risk, potentially influencing how these institutions assess and disclose such risks.', 'The failure of the resolution maintains the status quo, allowing the OCC rule to remain in effect, which may encourage continued integration of climate risk considerations in financial regulation.', 'The legislative attempt itself may signal to financial institutions and regulators the contested nature of climate-related financial regulation, possibly affecting future rulemaking and compliance strategies.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of an official bill summary and full text limits comprehensive analysis of the resolution's specific provisions and potential nuances. Transparency around the legislative rationale and detailed content would enhance public understanding. Monitoring the use of congressional disapproval resolutions is important to assess how legislative oversight interacts with agency rulemaking, especially in complex policy areas like climate-related financial risk management.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready