Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review".
Latest Action
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™This House Joint Resolution (HJRES 150) from the 118th Congress proposes congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) specifically targeting coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units. The rule under review involves the EPA's residual risk and technology review process, which assesses and updates standards to control hazardous air pollutants from these power plants. The resolution was referred to the Subcommittee on Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No official summary or full text of the bill is available in the source data.
HJRES 150 sought to reject an EPA rule regulating hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired power plants but did not advance beyond subcommittee review and expired.
- The resolution targets the EPA's rule on National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units.
- It uses the congressional disapproval mechanism under chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code, which allows Congress to overturn certain federal agency rules.
- The bill was referred to a relevant subcommittee but did not progress and is currently listed as failed or expired.
['Electric utility companies operating coal- and oil-fired steam generating units may benefit if the rule disapproval reduces regulatory compliance requirements.', 'Manufacturing and industrial sectors related to coal and oil power generation could see reduced regulatory burdens.', 'The EPA and environmental regulatory bodies are indirectly involved but would be affected by changes to their rulemaking authority.']
['The resolution’s failure to advance may reflect challenges in balancing environmental regulation with industry interests.', 'Disapproval of EPA rules could impact air quality and public health protections related to hazardous air pollutants.', 'Implementation considerations include the legal and procedural complexities of using the congressional disapproval process under the Congressional Review Act.', 'Oversight of emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants may be affected if the rule is disapproved.']
This resolution is part of ongoing legislative oversight and review of EPA regulations under the Congressional Review Act, a tool Congress uses to overturn federal agency rules. The bill's referral to the Subcommittee on Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials indicates a focus on environmental and industrial impacts. Its failure or expiration suggests it did not gain sufficient legislative support during the 118th Congress.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['Potential increase in emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants if the EPA rule is disapproved, possibly affecting regional air quality.', 'Possible shifts in energy sector regulatory compliance costs and investment decisions related to pollution control technologies.', 'Influence on future EPA rulemaking and congressional oversight dynamics regarding environmental regulations.']
The absence of an official bill summary and full text limits detailed analysis of specific provisions. The bill's status as failed or expired indicates no enacted change, but the use of the Congressional Review Act highlights the legislative mechanism for challenging federal agency rules. Transparency about the rule's content and the resolution's detailed arguments would enhance public understanding of the policy tradeoffs involved.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.