← Back to Bills
HJRES 165118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance".

Policy Area: Education
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Dec 5, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jul 23, 2024

Latest Action

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 442.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This House Joint Resolution (HJRES 165) from the 118th Congress proposes congressional disapproval of a Department of Education rule concerning nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. The resolution follows the procedures outlined in chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, which governs congressional review of federal regulations. The bill was received in the Senate, read twice, and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without becoming law. No official summary or full text of the bill is available in the source data.

Bottom Line

HJRES 165 sought to nullify a Department of Education rule on sex-based nondiscrimination in federally funded education programs but did not advance to enactment.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The resolution targets a Department of Education rule addressing nondiscrimination based on sex in education programs receiving federal funds.
  • It uses the congressional review process under chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code, allowing Congress to disapprove federal agency rules.
  • The bill was introduced in the House, passed there, and sent to the Senate, where it was placed on the legislative calendar but ultimately failed or expired.
Who Benefits?

['Congress, by exercising oversight over federal agency rulemaking', 'Educational institutions and programs subject to federal nondiscrimination regulations', "Potentially students and staff affected by the Department of Education's nondiscrimination policies"]

Potential Concerns

['Lack of available full bill text limits detailed understanding of specific provisions or language', 'Failure or expiration of the resolution means the underlying Department of Education rule remains in effect', 'Implementation considerations include how disapproval might affect ongoing enforcement of sex nondiscrimination protections']

Political Context

The resolution is part of the congressional review process allowing Congress to reject federal agency rules. It reflects legislative oversight of Department of Education regulations related to sex-based nondiscrimination in federally funded education programs. The bill passed the House and was received in the Senate but did not advance to final passage, resulting in its failure or expiration.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

["Continued enforcement of the Department of Education's sex nondiscrimination rule may influence institutional policies and compliance efforts.", 'The congressional review process use may signal legislative scrutiny of federal agency regulations, potentially affecting future rulemaking.', 'The failure of the resolution might affect stakeholder confidence in legislative efforts to modify or overturn agency rules.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of an official summary and full bill text limits transparency and detailed public understanding of the resolution's specific provisions. The legislative history shows the bill did not advance beyond placement on the Senate calendar, highlighting the importance of tracking procedural status for congressional review resolutions. Monitoring the impact of such disapproval resolutions on agency rule enforcement and stakeholder compliance remains critical for government transparency.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready