← Back to Bills
HJRES 194118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration entitled "Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks for Model Years 2027 and Beyond and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Heavy-Duty Pickup Trucks and Vans for Model Years 2030 and Beyond".

Policy Area: Energy
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Dec 6, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jul 25, 2024

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This House Joint Resolution (HJRES 194) from the 118th Congress proposes congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The rule in question sets Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for passenger cars and light trucks for model years 2027 and beyond, as well as fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans for model years 2030 and beyond. The resolution seeks to nullify these standards under the authority of chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, which governs congressional review of federal regulations. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No full text or official summary of the bill is available in the provided data.

Bottom Line

HJRES 194 aimed to reject new fuel economy and efficiency standards set by NHTSA for certain vehicles but did not advance beyond committee referral and expired.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The resolution targets NHTSA's rule on fuel economy standards for passenger cars, light trucks, and heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans for future model years.
  • It uses the Congressional Review Act mechanism to disapprove and nullify the regulatory rule.
  • The bill was introduced in the House and referred to the Energy and Commerce Committee but did not proceed further and expired.
Who Benefits?

['Automobile manufacturers potentially affected by the fuel economy standards', 'NHTSA as the regulatory agency involved', 'Stakeholders in the energy and automotive sectors monitoring regulatory changes']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of available full bill text limits detailed analysis of specific provisions or enforcement mechanisms', 'The use of the Congressional Review Act to overturn regulations may raise questions about regulatory stability and long-term policy planning', 'Potential implementation challenges if the disapproval had passed, including impacts on vehicle manufacturing and environmental standards']

Political Context

The bill was introduced during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. It addresses federal fuel economy and efficiency standards, a policy area often subject to debate regarding environmental goals and industry regulation. The resolution ultimately failed or expired, indicating it did not gain sufficient legislative support to advance.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['If enacted, the disapproval could have delayed or reversed implementation of updated fuel economy standards, potentially affecting environmental outcomes and automotive industry compliance timelines.', 'The legislative attempt may influence future regulatory approaches or industry lobbying strategies related to vehicle efficiency standards.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary reduces transparency and complicates public and expert review. The bill's use of the Congressional Review Act highlights the importance of oversight on regulatory reversals, which can have significant downstream effects on policy stability and enforcement. Monitoring the legislative process and committee actions is essential to understand the full implications of such resolutions.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready