Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Defense relating to "Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Architect and Engineering Service Fees (DFARS Case 2024-D019)".
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™House Joint Resolution 196 (HJRES 196) from the 118th Congress is a legislative measure proposing congressional disapproval of a Department of Defense (DoD) rule related to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) concerning architect and engineering service fees, specifically DFARS Case 2024-D019. The resolution seeks to nullify the rule under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, which governs congressional review of federal regulations. The bill was introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Armed Services but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No official summary or full text of the bill is available, limiting detailed analysis of the specific provisions or changes targeted by the disapproval resolution.
HJRES 196 aimed to disapprove a DoD rule on architect and engineering service fees under the DFARS but did not advance beyond committee referral and expired without passage.
- The bill is a joint resolution for congressional disapproval of a DoD rule under the Congressional Review Act (chapter 8 of title 5, U.S. Code).
- The rule targeted by the resolution relates to architect and engineering service fees within the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS Case 2024-D019).
- The resolution was referred to the House Committee on Armed Services on August 2, 2024, and did not progress further, resulting in failure or expiration.
['Department of Defense and its contracting entities if the rule remains in effect', 'Architect and engineering firms engaged in defense contracts potentially affected by the fee structure', 'Congressional oversight bodies monitoring federal acquisition regulations']
["Lack of publicly available full bill text and official summary limits transparency and detailed understanding of the rule's impact and the resolution's implications.", 'The disapproval process under the Congressional Review Act may affect the stability and predictability of acquisition regulations for defense contractors.', 'Potential administrative and compliance costs for DoD and contractors if the rule is disapproved and subsequently revised or replaced.']
HJRES 196 was introduced during the 118th Congress as part of the congressional oversight mechanism to review and potentially disapprove federal agency rules. The resolution specifically targets a DoD acquisition regulation update concerning architect and engineering service fees. Referral to the House Committee on Armed Services aligns with the committee's jurisdiction over defense procurement matters. The resolution did not advance beyond committee referral and expired, indicating limited legislative momentum or prioritization.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['If enacted, disapproval of the DFARS rule could prompt the Department of Defense to revise or delay implementation of acquisition fee policies, affecting contract negotiations and budgeting.', 'Potential shifts in architect and engineering service fees may influence the cost structure and competitiveness of defense contracts.', 'Legislative disapproval actions may signal congressional scrutiny of defense acquisition regulations, potentially affecting future rulemaking processes.']
The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits the ability to fully assess the scope and impact of HJRES 196. Transparency in legislative documentation is critical for informed public and stakeholder engagement. Additionally, the resolution's referral to the House Committee on Armed Services aligns with standard oversight procedures for defense-related regulations. Monitoring the outcomes of such disapproval resolutions is important to understand their effects on federal acquisition policy stability and defense contracting practices.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.