← Back to Bills
HR 3316118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

To amend titles 46 and 49, United States Code, to streamline the environmental review process for major projects, and for other purposes.

Policy Area: Environmental Protection
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Nov 18, 2025
Latest Action Date
Dec 19, 2024

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 760.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, introduced in the 118th Congress as H.R. 3316, proposes amendments to titles 46 and 49 of the United States Code with the goal of streamlining the environmental review process for major projects. The intent is to modify existing procedures to potentially expedite project approvals by reducing delays associated with environmental assessments and reviews. The bill was placed on the Union Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without enactment. No full text or official summary is available to provide detailed provisions or mechanisms.

Bottom Line

H.R. 3316 aimed to accelerate environmental reviews for major projects by amending federal statutes but did not advance to become law during the 118th Congress.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill targets titles 46 and 49 of the U.S. Code, which relate to maritime and transportation regulations.
  • Its primary focus is to streamline the environmental review process for major projects, potentially affecting project timelines and regulatory procedures.
  • The bill was placed on the Union Calendar (Calendar No. 760) but failed or expired without further legislative action.
Who Benefits?

['Federal agencies responsible for environmental reviews and project approvals', 'Project developers and industries involved in major infrastructure or transportation projects', 'Potentially state and local governments involved in permitting processes']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of detailed text limits understanding of specific changes and their implications for environmental protections', 'Streamlining reviews may raise concerns about adequate oversight and thoroughness of environmental assessments', 'Potential tradeoffs between expedited project approvals and environmental safeguards are not detailed', 'No information on funding, enforcement, or oversight mechanisms is available']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and placed on the Union Calendar, indicating it was scheduled for consideration. However, it failed or expired without passage. The legislative context suggests an effort to address regulatory processes related to environmental reviews in infrastructure or transportation sectors, but no further legislative progress was made.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Potential acceleration of project timelines could lead to increased infrastructure development activity.', 'Reduced environmental review duration might affect environmental quality or public participation in decision-making.', 'Changes in federal review processes could shift responsibilities or burdens to state or local agencies.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits the ability to fully assess the bill's provisions and impacts. The bill's failure to advance suggests limited legislative support or unresolved issues. Transparency about how environmental reviews would be streamlined and what safeguards would remain is critical for public understanding and oversight.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 60%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready