← Back to Bills
HR 3378118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Agricultural Security Risk Review Act

Policy Area: Foreign Trade and International Finance
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
May 27, 2025
Latest Action Date
Dec 19, 2024

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 783.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

The Agricultural Security Risk Review Act (H.R. 3378) was a bill introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at addressing risks related to agricultural security. While the official summary and full text of the bill are not available, the bill was categorized under the policy area of Foreign Trade and International Finance, suggesting it involved aspects of agricultural trade security or related financial risks. The bill was placed on the Union Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without further legislative action as of December 19, 2024.

Bottom Line

H.R. 3378 sought to address agricultural security risks within the context of foreign trade and finance but did not advance beyond being placed on the legislative calendar and expired without passage.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and designated as H.R. 3378.
  • It was placed on the Union Calendar, indicating it was scheduled for consideration but did not proceed to a vote.
  • The bill is related to the policy area of Foreign Trade and International Finance, implying a focus on agricultural security in the context of international trade or financial risk.
Who Benefits?

['Agricultural producers and stakeholders involved in foreign trade', 'Government agencies responsible for agricultural security and trade', 'Entities involved in managing risks related to agricultural imports and exports']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of available full text and official summary limits understanding of specific provisions and implementation requirements', 'Potential challenges in oversight and enforcement due to absence of detailed legislative language', "Unclear funding mechanisms or authority granted to agencies to carry out the bill's objectives"]

Political Context

The bill was introduced and scheduled for consideration during the 118th Congress but did not progress beyond placement on the Union Calendar. Its failure or expiration indicates it did not receive sufficient legislative support or priority for further action. The policy area classification suggests it was part of broader efforts to address agricultural security within international trade frameworks.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Potential increased uncertainty for agricultural trade stakeholders due to lack of new security risk frameworks.', 'Missed opportunity to enhance coordination between trade and agricultural security agencies.', 'Continued reliance on existing policies and mechanisms for managing agricultural security risks.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of the bill's full text and official summary limits transparency and public understanding of the proposed measures. Additionally, the bill's failure to progress beyond the Union Calendar highlights the importance of tracking legislative movement to assess policy developments effectively. Future transparency efforts would benefit from ensuring full availability of legislative documents to facilitate comprehensive oversight.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 70%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready