Abolish the ATF Act
Latest Action
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Burlison asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 374, a bill originally introduced by Representative Gaetz, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™H.R. 374, titled the 'Abolish the ATF Act,' is a bill introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at eliminating the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The bill's text and official summary are not available, but the legislative action indicates a procedural step to add cosponsors and request reprintings. The bill falls under the policy area of Crime and Law Enforcement and has a status of Failed / Expired as of the latest update.
This bill proposes the abolition of the ATF, but lacks publicly available detailed text or summary, and it did not advance beyond initial procedural actions before expiring.
- The bill seeks to abolish the ATF, a federal agency involved in regulating alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives.
- No official summary or full text is available to detail the mechanisms or consequences of abolishing the ATF.
- The latest legislative action was a procedural motion to assign first sponsorship and add cosponsors, with no further progress recorded.
['Potentially, entities or individuals who prefer reduced federal regulation or oversight in areas managed by the ATF might benefit.', 'Legislators or interest groups advocating for changes in federal law enforcement structures related to firearms and explosives regulation.']
['Lack of detailed bill text limits understanding of how responsibilities of the ATF would be reassigned or managed post-abolition.', 'Potential gaps in enforcement and regulatory oversight related to alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives if the agency is abolished without clear transition plans.', 'Unclear fiscal implications or cost savings due to absence of detailed provisions.']
The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and is categorized under Crime and Law Enforcement. The latest recorded action was procedural, indicating early-stage consideration without substantive debate or committee action. The bill ultimately failed or expired without passage.
High concern review — 2 hidden impact flags detected
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['Potential increase in regulatory and enforcement burdens on other federal or state agencies if ATF functions are not reassigned effectively.', 'Possible impacts on public safety and crime prevention related to firearms and explosives regulation.', 'Economic effects on industries regulated by the ATF due to changes in oversight and compliance requirements.']
The absence of an official summary and full bill text limits transparency and public understanding of the bill's provisions and implications. Monitoring legislative progress and availability of detailed documentation is essential for informed oversight. The bill's failure to advance beyond procedural steps highlights the importance of comprehensive legislative records for accountability.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.