← Back to Bills
HR 7803118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide a good faith exception to the imposition of certain fines, and for other purposes.

Policy Area: Commerce
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
May 27, 2025
Latest Action Date
May 16, 2024

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, H.R. 7803 from the 118th Congress, proposes an amendment to title 35 of the United States Code to establish a good faith exception to the imposition of certain fines. The bill aims to modify the current legal framework governing fines related to patent law enforcement by allowing exceptions when actions are taken in good faith. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and was ordered to be reported by voice vote on May 16, 2024. However, the bill ultimately failed or expired without becoming law. No full text or official summary is available to provide detailed provisions or scope.

Bottom Line

H.R. 7803 sought to create a good faith exception for certain fines under patent law but did not advance into law and lacks detailed publicly available text or summary.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill proposes an amendment to title 35 of the United States Code, which governs patents.
  • It introduces a good faith exception to the imposition of certain fines, potentially affecting enforcement actions.
  • The bill was ordered to be reported by voice vote but ultimately failed or expired during the legislative process.
Who Benefits?

['Patent holders and applicants who may face fines under patent law enforcement', 'Legal practitioners and entities involved in patent litigation or enforcement', 'Businesses and industries reliant on patent protections']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of detailed text limits understanding of how the good faith exception would be defined or applied', "Potential challenges in enforcement or oversight due to subjective nature of 'good faith'", 'Unclear fiscal impact or administrative costs associated with implementing the exception']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and was considered under the Commerce policy area. It was ordered to be reported by voice vote, indicating some level of bipartisan or non-contentious support at that stage. However, it ultimately failed or expired, suggesting it did not progress through the full legislative process to become law. No further legislative actions or amendments are recorded.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 1

GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

1 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Potential reduction in fines imposed on patent holders or applicants acting in good faith, which could influence patent enforcement dynamics.', 'Possible increase in litigation or disputes over what constitutes good faith, affecting courts and legal costs.', 'Changes in patent enforcement behavior by agencies or private parties due to altered risk of fines.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits comprehensive analysis. Transparency would be improved by providing detailed legislative language and definitions, particularly regarding the scope and application of the good faith exception. Oversight considerations include monitoring how the exception might affect enforcement consistency and administrative burden.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 70%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready