← Back to Bills
HR 7987118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Plain Language in Contracting Act

Policy Area: Commerce
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
May 27, 2025
Latest Action Date
May 23, 2024

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 409.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

The Plain Language in Contracting Act (H.R. 7987) was a legislative proposal introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at improving the clarity and understandability of government contracting documents. Although the full text and official summary are not available, the bill's title and policy area suggest it sought to mandate or encourage the use of plain language in federal contracting processes to make contracts more accessible and reduce complexity. The bill was considered by the House and later placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without becoming law.

Bottom Line

H.R. 7987 intended to promote clearer government contracting language but did not advance into law during the 118th Congress.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill focused on the use of plain language in federal government contracting.
  • It was introduced in the House of Representatives during the 118th Congress.
  • The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar but failed or expired without passage.
Who Benefits?

['Federal agencies involved in contracting', 'Contractors and businesses engaging in government contracts', 'Legal and compliance professionals working with government contracts', 'Taxpayers and the general public seeking transparency in government procurement']

Potential Concerns

['Implementation challenges related to defining and enforcing plain language standards in complex contracts', 'Potential costs associated with revising existing contracting templates and training personnel', 'Oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance with plain language requirements were not detailed', 'The absence of the full bill text limits assessment of authority changes or enforcement provisions']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the House and subsequently placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders as Calendar No. 409. However, it did not progress further and was classified as failed or expired. The lack of an official summary or full text in the source data limits detailed contextual analysis. The policy area is commerce, indicating a focus on government procurement processes.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Improved clarity in contracting documents could reduce misunderstandings and disputes between government agencies and contractors.', 'Simplification of contract language may lead to faster procurement processes and lower administrative costs over time.', 'Enhanced transparency could increase public trust in government contracting activities.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The lack of an official summary and full bill text limits comprehensive analysis. Transparency about enforcement, oversight, and cost implications is essential for evaluating the bill's practical impact. Monitoring future proposals on plain language in contracting should focus on detailed implementation plans and accountability measures.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 75%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready