To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the armed forces wear be made in America, and for other purposes.
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™This bill, introduced in the 118th Congress as H.R. 8166, proposes to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations mandating that optional combat boots worn by members of the armed forces be manufactured in the United States. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Armed Services but did not advance further and is currently classified as failed or expired. No official summary or full text is available, limiting detailed analysis of specific provisions or enforcement mechanisms.
H.R. 8166 sought to ensure that optional combat boots for U.S. military personnel are made domestically, but the bill did not progress beyond committee referral and is no longer active.
- The bill mandates the Secretary of Defense to regulate that optional combat boots worn by armed forces members be made in America.
- It was introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Armed Services on April 30, 2024.
- The bill did not advance and is currently listed as failed or expired, with no full text or official summary publicly available.
['U.S. manufacturers of combat boots and related footwear', 'Members of the armed forces who wear the boots', 'The Department of Defense as the implementing agency']
['Lack of publicly available full bill text limits understanding of regulatory scope and enforcement provisions.', 'Potential cost implications for the Department of Defense and military supply chains due to sourcing requirements.', 'Oversight mechanisms and authority delegation to the Secretary of Defense are not detailed.', 'No information on exceptions, waivers, or impact on existing contracts.']
The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. It addresses procurement policy within the armed forces, specifically focusing on domestic manufacturing requirements for optional combat boots. The bill did not proceed beyond committee referral and is currently classified as failed or expired.
High concern review — 3 hidden impact flags detected
GovScope reviewed 3 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['Potential stimulation of domestic manufacturing sectors related to combat boots.', 'Possible adjustments in military supply chain logistics to comply with new sourcing requirements.', 'Impact on existing contracts with foreign manufacturers if the mandate were implemented.']
The absence of a full bill text and official summary restricts comprehensive transparency and oversight. Monitoring the regulatory process by the Secretary of Defense, if the bill had passed, would be critical to ensure compliance and assess cost impacts. The bill's failure to advance limits current oversight opportunities.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.