← Back to Bills
HR 8348118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

CISA Securing AI Task Force Act

Policy Area: Armed Forces and National Security
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Aug 6, 2024
Latest Action Date
May 10, 2024

Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

The CISA Securing AI Task Force Act (H.R. 8348) was a legislative proposal introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at establishing a task force within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) focused on securing artificial intelligence technologies. The bill sought to address national security concerns related to AI by coordinating efforts to protect AI systems from cyber threats. The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No full text or detailed summary is available to provide specifics on the task force's structure, responsibilities, or funding.

Bottom Line

H.R. 8348 intended to create a CISA task force to enhance AI security but did not advance beyond subcommittee referral and expired without enactment.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress.
  • It aimed to establish a task force within CISA focused on securing artificial intelligence.
  • The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection but did not progress further.
Who Benefits?

['Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)', 'Federal agencies involved in AI and cybersecurity', 'Organizations and sectors reliant on AI technologies for national security', 'Potentially the broader public through improved AI security measures']

Potential Concerns

["Lack of detailed information on the task force's authority and funding mechanisms limits assessment of implementation feasibility.", 'Unclear oversight and accountability provisions for the task force.', 'Potential overlap or coordination challenges with existing cybersecurity and AI initiatives within the federal government.']

Political Context

The bill was introduced amid growing legislative interest in securing emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, due to national security implications. It was referred to a relevant subcommittee but did not advance, reflecting either competing legislative priorities or unresolved policy details. No further legislative actions were recorded before the bill expired.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Improved coordination on AI security could enhance national cybersecurity posture if implemented effectively.', 'Creation of a dedicated task force might lead to increased federal focus and resources on AI-related threats.', 'Potential administrative burden or resource diversion within CISA and related agencies.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

Transparency is limited by the absence of full bill text and official summary, restricting comprehensive analysis. Oversight considerations include clarifying the task force's authority, funding, and coordination with existing programs to avoid duplication. Monitoring future legislative efforts on AI security within CISA is recommended to assess evolving policy frameworks.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 70%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready