← Back to Bills
HR 8594118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Stop the Scam Act

Policy Area: Transportation and Public Works
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Dec 6, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jun 3, 2024

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

The Stop the Scam Act (H.R. 8594) was a bill introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at addressing issues related to scams, likely within the scope of transportation and public works, as indicated by its policy area classification. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security but ultimately failed or expired without further legislative action. No official summary or full text is available, limiting detailed analysis of its provisions or specific measures.

Bottom Line

H.R. 8594, the Stop the Scam Act, was a bill focused on combating scams in the transportation and public works sector that did not advance beyond committee referral and expired without enactment.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
  • It is categorized under the policy area of Transportation and Public Works, suggesting a focus on scams related to that sector.
  • The bill did not progress beyond referral and is listed as failed or expired, with no official summary or full text publicly available.
Who Benefits?

['Potentially, consumers and businesses involved in transportation and public works who may be protected from scams if the bill had provisions targeting fraudulent activities.', 'Government agencies responsible for homeland security and transportation oversight might benefit from clearer authority or tools to combat scams, though specifics are unavailable.']

Potential Concerns

["Lack of publicly available full text and official summary limits understanding of the bill's scope, enforcement mechanisms, and funding implications.", 'Without detailed provisions, it is unclear how the bill intended to balance enforcement authority with privacy or due process protections.', 'The failure to advance past committee suggests possible challenges in garnering sufficient legislative support or addressing implementation complexities.']

Political Context

The bill was introduced during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security, indicating an intent to address security-related issues within transportation and public works. Its failure to progress suggests it did not receive prioritization or sufficient support in the legislative agenda during that session.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 1

GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

1 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['If enacted, the bill could have influenced regulatory practices within transportation and public works sectors by introducing new anti-scam measures.', 'Potentially increased workload or resource needs for homeland security and transportation agencies tasked with enforcement.', 'Possible deterrence of fraudulent activities in targeted sectors, improving consumer and business confidence.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of an official summary and full text restricts comprehensive analysis and public oversight. Transparency in legislative documentation is critical for informed debate and accountability. The bill's failure to advance also highlights the importance of tracking legislative progress to understand policy priorities and gaps.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 40%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready