← Back to Bills
HR 8895118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain payments to foreign related parties subject to sufficient foreign tax are not treated as base erosion payments.

Policy Area: Taxation
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Aug 27, 2024
Latest Action Date
Jun 28, 2024

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, H.R. 8895 from the 118th Congress, proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It aims to exclude certain payments made to foreign related parties from being classified as base erosion payments, provided those payments are subject to sufficient foreign tax. The bill was introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No full text or detailed summary is available, limiting the depth of analysis.

Bottom Line

H.R. 8895 sought to modify tax rules to exempt some foreign-related payments from base erosion provisions if adequately taxed abroad, but it did not advance beyond committee referral and is no longer active.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill targets the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, focusing on base erosion payments.
  • It proposes that payments to foreign related parties with sufficient foreign tax should not be treated as base erosion payments.
  • The bill was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means on June 28, 2024, but failed or expired without further legislative progress.
Who Benefits?

['Multinational corporations making payments to foreign related parties', 'Foreign tax authorities receiving sufficient tax on these payments', 'Tax professionals and advisors dealing with international tax compliance']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of detailed bill text limits clarity on definitions and enforcement mechanisms.', "Potential complexity in determining what constitutes 'sufficient foreign tax' could complicate compliance and oversight.", "The bill's failure to advance may reflect challenges in legislative consensus or competing tax policy priorities."]

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, the primary tax-writing committee. It did not progress beyond referral and is listed as failed or expired. The absence of a summary or full text in the available data limits understanding of its legislative intent or support levels.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Could incentivize multinational corporations to structure payments to ensure foreign tax sufficiency to avoid base erosion rules.', 'May influence international tax planning strategies and cross-border payment arrangements.', 'Potentially impacts U.S. tax revenue by narrowing the base erosion tax base.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits transparency and comprehensive analysis. The bill's failure to advance suggests limited legislative support or unresolved policy issues. Clear definitions and enforcement provisions are critical for effective tax legislation, and their absence here is notable. Oversight bodies should monitor similar proposals for clarity and potential impacts on tax base erosion enforcement.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 70%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready