← Back to Bills
HR 9658118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

To establish "Silver Sea Bream" as an acceptable market name for Stenotomus chrysops.

Policy Area: Health
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Dec 16, 2024
Latest Action Date
Sep 18, 2024

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, introduced in the 118th Congress as H.R. 9658, proposes to officially designate "Silver Sea Bream" as an acceptable market name for the fish species Stenotomus chrysops. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce but did not advance further and is currently classified as failed or expired. There is no official summary or full text available to provide additional details about the bill's provisions or implementation mechanisms.

Bottom Line

H.R. 9658 sought to standardize the market name for Stenotomus chrysops as "Silver Sea Bream," but the bill did not progress beyond committee referral and is now expired.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill aims to establish "Silver Sea Bream" as an acceptable market name for the fish species Stenotomus chrysops.
  • It was introduced in the House of Representatives during the 118th Congress.
  • The bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on September 18, 2024, but did not advance and is now failed or expired.
Who Benefits?

['Seafood industry stakeholders involved in marketing and selling Stenotomus chrysops', 'Consumers seeking clarity and standardization in seafood labeling', 'Regulatory agencies overseeing seafood market names']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of detailed provisions or implementation guidelines due to absence of full bill text', 'Potential costs or administrative burdens related to updating market name standards', 'Oversight and enforcement mechanisms are not specified in the available information']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. It did not receive further legislative action and is classified as failed or expired. The policy area is identified as Health, likely due to food labeling regulations falling under this category. No additional legislative context or debate records are available.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Standardizing the market name could improve consumer confidence and reduce confusion in seafood purchasing decisions.', 'Potential minor administrative updates required for regulatory agencies and seafood businesses to align labeling practices.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of both an official summary and the full bill text limits transparency and comprehensive oversight. Without detailed provisions, it is difficult to assess enforcement, funding, or broader regulatory impacts. The bill's failure to advance beyond committee referral further restricts available information for public scrutiny.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready