AI Incident Reporting and Security Enhancement Act
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™The AI Incident Reporting and Security Enhancement Act (H.R. 9720) is a legislative proposal introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at establishing a framework for reporting incidents related to artificial intelligence systems and enhancing security measures around AI technologies. The bill is situated within the policy area of Science, Technology, and Communications and was last ordered to be reported by voice vote on September 25, 2024. However, the bill ultimately failed or expired without becoming law. Specific details about the bill's provisions, including definitions, reporting requirements, enforcement mechanisms, or funding, are not available in the provided source data.
H.R. 9720 sought to create a formal process for AI incident reporting and improve AI security but did not advance to enactment during the 118th Congress.
- The bill focuses on AI incident reporting and security enhancement within the technology sector.
- It was introduced in the House of Representatives during the 118th Congress.
- The latest recorded legislative action was an order to report the bill by voice vote on September 25, 2024.
- The bill ultimately failed or expired and did not become law.
- No official summary or full text is available to provide detailed provisions or requirements.
['Government agencies responsible for technology oversight and cybersecurity', 'Organizations developing or deploying AI systems', 'Potentially the general public through improved AI safety and incident transparency']
['Lack of available full text limits understanding of implementation requirements and enforcement mechanisms', 'Potential costs associated with establishing and maintaining AI incident reporting systems', 'Unclear authority and oversight provisions due to missing detailed legislative language', 'Possible challenges in defining reportable AI incidents without explicit definitions']
The bill was introduced in the House during the 118th Congress and was related to the growing legislative interest in regulating artificial intelligence technologies. The order to report by voice vote indicates some level of procedural progress, but the bill did not advance further and expired. The absence of a public summary or full text in the source data limits detailed contextual analysis.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['If enacted, the bill could have prompted increased transparency and accountability in AI system operations.', 'Establishing incident reporting might lead to improved AI security standards and risk management practices.', 'Potential administrative burden on organizations required to comply with reporting mandates.']
The absence of the full bill text and official summary significantly limits the ability to assess the specific provisions, enforcement mechanisms, and funding implications of H.R. 9720. Transparency in legislative documentation is critical for public understanding and oversight. The bill's failure to advance suggests that further legislative or stakeholder engagement would be necessary to address AI incident reporting comprehensively.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.