Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6276) to direct the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify the utilization rate of certain public buildings and federally-leased space, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1065) denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies.
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™This House Resolution (H.Res. 1071) pertains to the procedures for considering two separate legislative measures: H.R. 6276, which directs the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify utilization rates of certain public buildings and federally-leased spaces, and H.Res. 1065, a resolution denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies. The resolution sets the terms for debate and consideration of these measures in the House of Representatives.
H.Res. 1071 establishes the rules for debating and voting on a bill about federal building utilization and a resolution criticizing immigration policies, but the resolution ultimately failed or expired without becoming law.
- Provides for consideration of H.R. 6276, which focuses on assessing utilization rates of federal buildings and leased spaces.
- Provides for consideration of H.Res. 1065, a resolution denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies.
- The resolution governs the procedural aspects of how these measures are debated and voted on in the House.
['Administrator of General Services', 'Office of Management and Budget', 'Federal agencies managing public buildings and leased spaces', 'Members of Congress involved in oversight of federal property and immigration policy']
['The resolution does not include substantive policy changes but governs legislative procedure, which may affect the timing and manner of debate.', 'No direct funding or enforcement mechanisms are specified within the resolution itself.', "The resolution's failure or expiration means the underlying measures were not advanced through this procedural vehicle."]
The resolution was introduced in the 118th Congress and relates to two distinct issues: federal property management and immigration policy. It reflects procedural steps in the House to consider these topics but did not result in enacted legislation. The inclusion of a resolution denouncing immigration policies indicates a politically sensitive context, though the resolution itself is procedural.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['Setting terms for consideration may influence the legislative calendar and prioritization of related bills.', 'Procedural resolutions can affect the scope and duration of debate, potentially impacting stakeholder engagement and public awareness.', 'Failure or expiration of the resolution may delay or prevent advancement of the underlying measures.']
As a procedural resolution, H.Res. 1071 does not enact policy but affects legislative workflow. Transparency considerations include clear public access to debate rules and timing, as well as the implications of combining unrelated policy topics in one procedural vehicle. The lack of substantive text limits direct oversight concerns but highlights the importance of monitoring procedural mechanisms in Congress.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.