Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal Government should recoup monies from the Synergy Marine Group and Maersk Line Limited to compensate taxpayers for certain damages resulting from the allision of the cargo shipping vessel the Dali with the Francis Scott Key Bridge on March 26, 2024, and for other purposes.
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™House Resolution 1116 expresses the sense of the U.S. House of Representatives that the federal government should seek to recover funds from Synergy Marine Group and Maersk Line Limited. These funds would compensate taxpayers for damages caused by the allision of the cargo ship Dali with the Francis Scott Key Bridge on March 26, 2024. The resolution was referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure but did not advance further and is currently classified as failed or expired. The bill falls under the policy area of Transportation and Public Works and does not include detailed legislative text or specific enforcement mechanisms in the available data.
H.Res. 1116 is a non-binding resolution urging the federal government to recoup costs from responsible parties for damages to a federal bridge, but it did not progress beyond committee referral and lacks detailed legislative provisions.
- The resolution addresses financial recovery related to a maritime accident involving the cargo ship Dali and the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
- It identifies Synergy Marine Group and Maersk Line Limited as entities from which the government should seek compensation.
- The bill was referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on April 5, 2024, but did not advance and is now failed or expired.
['Federal government and taxpayers potentially benefiting from recovered funds to offset damages.', 'Agencies responsible for bridge maintenance and infrastructure repair, such as the Department of Transportation.']
['The resolution is non-binding and does not establish a clear legal or enforcement framework for recouping funds.', 'Lack of detailed bill text limits clarity on mechanisms for compensation or oversight.', 'Potential challenges in determining liability and recovering funds from private maritime companies.']
This resolution was introduced in the 118th Congress following a specific incident involving a cargo ship and a federal bridge. It reflects congressional interest in addressing infrastructure damage and taxpayer compensation but did not proceed beyond committee referral, indicating limited legislative momentum or prioritization.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['Potential increased scrutiny on maritime companies operating near federal infrastructure.', 'Possible influence on future legislative efforts to strengthen liability and compensation frameworks for infrastructure damage.', 'Heightened awareness of infrastructure vulnerabilities related to maritime traffic.']
The resolution lacks binding authority and detailed provisions, which limits its direct impact. Transparency is constrained by the absence of full legislative text, making it difficult to assess enforcement or funding mechanisms. Oversight considerations include monitoring any subsequent actions by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure or related agencies regarding compensation claims.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.