Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7888) to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 529) to extend the customs waters of the United States from 12 nautical miles to 24 nautical miles from the baselines of the United States, consistent with Presidential Proclamation 7219; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1112) denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies; and providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1117) opposing efforts to place one-sided pressure on Israel with respect to Gaza.
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™House Resolution 1125 (H.Res. 1125) is a procedural rule providing for the consideration of multiple legislative items in the House of Representatives. These items include the bill H.R. 7888, which aims to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978; the bill H.R. 529, which proposes extending the customs waters of the United States from 12 nautical miles to 24 nautical miles consistent with Presidential Proclamation 7219; and two resolutions, H.Res. 1112 denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies, and H.Res. 1117 opposing efforts to place one-sided pressure on Israel with respect to Gaza. The resolution sets the terms and conditions under which these bills and resolutions are to be considered by the House. The resolution itself does not enact policy but governs the legislative process for these measures. The resolution was agreed to without objection, and a motion to reconsider was laid on the table, indicating no further action was taken on this procedural rule. The bill is currently listed as failed or expired.
H.Res. 1125 is a procedural rule that structured the House's consideration of several bills and resolutions on intelligence reform, maritime boundaries, immigration policy, and foreign policy toward Israel and Gaza, but it did not itself enact substantive policy and is now expired.
- Provides the terms for House consideration of H.R. 7888 to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
- Provides the terms for House consideration of H.R. 529 to extend U.S. customs waters from 12 to 24 nautical miles.
- Provides the terms for House consideration of two resolutions addressing immigration policy and U.S. policy on Israel and Gaza.
- The resolution was agreed to without objection and is now failed or expired.
- The resolution itself does not contain substantive policy provisions but governs legislative procedure.
['Members of the U.S. House of Representatives, by establishing clear procedures for debate and amendment of the specified bills and resolutions.', 'Legislative staff and committees involved in the bills and resolutions covered by the rule.', 'Stakeholders in the policy areas affected by the underlying bills and resolutions, including intelligence agencies, maritime authorities, immigration policy advocates, and foreign policy stakeholders.']
['As a procedural rule, the resolution does not address substantive policy details, so oversight and implementation considerations depend on the underlying bills and resolutions.', 'The failure or expiration of the resolution may delay or complicate the legislative process for the associated bills and resolutions.', 'No direct funding or enforcement mechanisms are included in the resolution itself.']
H.Res. 1125 was introduced in the 118th Congress to set the terms for House consideration of several significant and potentially contentious legislative items, including intelligence reform, maritime boundary extension, immigration policy criticism, and foreign policy toward Israel and Gaza. The resolution reflects the House's procedural approach to managing debate and amendment on these issues. The resolution was agreed to without objection but is now listed as failed or expired, indicating it did not lead to further legislative action under this procedural rule.
Hidden impact flags detected: 1
GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['By setting terms for consideration, the resolution could affect the legislative timeline and the ability of members to amend or debate the underlying bills and resolutions.', 'The procedural framework may influence the political dynamics around the underlying issues of intelligence reform, maritime boundaries, immigration policy, and foreign policy toward Israel and Gaza.']
This resolution is procedural and does not contain substantive policy provisions or funding. Transparency considerations focus on how procedural rules may shape legislative debate and amendment opportunities for significant policy bills. The lack of substantive text limits direct policy analysis, and the resolution's failure or expiration means it did not advance the underlying bills or resolutions under this procedural framework.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.