Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6192) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7109) to require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 109) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121"; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2925) to amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to provide for security of tenure for use of mining claims for ancillary activities, and for other purposes.
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™House Resolution 1194 is a procedural rule providing for the consideration of multiple bills and a joint resolution in the House of Representatives. These include H.R. 6192, which seeks to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to restrict the Secretary of Energy from setting new or amended energy conservation standards unless they are technologically feasible and economically justified; H.R. 7109, which proposes adding a citizenship question to the decennial census and modifying apportionment based on U.S. citizens rather than all persons; H.J. Res. 109, which concerns congressional disapproval of a Securities and Exchange Commission rule related to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121; and H.R. 2925, which aims to amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to provide security of tenure for mining claims used for ancillary activities. The resolution sets the terms for debate and consideration of these measures but does not itself enact policy changes. The latest action was the motion to reconsider being laid on the table without objection, and the bill ultimately failed or expired without passage.
H.Res. 1194 was a procedural measure to govern debate on several substantive bills but did not become law and thus did not directly change policy.
- The resolution provided for consideration of four separate legislative measures covering energy conservation standards, census citizenship questions, SEC rule disapproval, and mining claim tenure.
- It set the terms and procedures for debate in the House but did not itself enact any policy.
- The resolution failed or expired without passage, meaning the underlying bills were not advanced through this procedural vehicle.
['Legislators seeking structured debate on the specified bills', 'Stakeholders in energy regulation, census administration, securities regulation, and mining activities who are affected by the underlying bills']
['As a procedural rule, the resolution does not address implementation or enforcement but the underlying bills may raise concerns about feasibility, economic impact, and administrative complexity.', 'The failure of the resolution may delay or prevent consideration of the substantive bills it covered.']
This resolution was introduced in the 118th Congress to manage House floor consideration of multiple bills addressing diverse policy areas including energy standards, census methodology, securities regulation, and mining claims. Procedural rules like this are common to structure debate and voting but do not themselves enact policy. The resolution was agreed to without objection on a motion to reconsider but ultimately failed or expired, indicating it did not advance the underlying bills through this mechanism.
Hidden impact flags detected: 1
GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['By setting terms for consideration, the resolution could influence the timing and manner in which the underlying bills are debated, potentially affecting their legislative prospects.', 'Failure or expiration of the resolution may delay or prevent legislative action on the bills it covered.']
As a procedural rule, H.Res. 1194 does not itself change policy but is important for transparency in understanding how the House schedules and manages debate on significant legislation. The lack of a full bill text and official summary limits detailed analysis of procedural specifics. Monitoring the progress and outcomes of the underlying bills is necessary to assess substantive policy impacts.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.