Reaffirming that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute and does not recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™House Resolution 1253, introduced in the 118th Congress, is a non-binding resolution reaffirming that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute and does not recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The resolution expresses the House's position on U.S. sovereignty regarding international criminal jurisdiction but does not create enforceable law or policy changes. The resolution was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No official summary or full text is publicly available beyond the title and procedural status.
H.Res. 1253 is a symbolic resolution stating the U.S. does not accept ICC jurisdiction, reflecting a position on international law without creating binding legal obligations or policy changes.
- The resolution reaffirms that the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the ICC.
- It states that the U.S. does not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC over U.S. persons or actions.
- The resolution was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs but did not advance and is listed as failed or expired.
['U.S. government agencies involved in foreign policy and international law enforcement', 'U.S. military and diplomatic personnel potentially affected by ICC jurisdiction', 'Advocates for U.S. sovereignty in international legal matters']
['As a non-binding resolution, it does not create enforceable policy but may influence diplomatic relations or international perceptions.', 'Lack of detailed legislative text limits clarity on specific actions or consequences.', 'Potential tradeoffs in international cooperation on criminal justice issues are not addressed.']
The resolution reflects ongoing U.S. legislative positions regarding the ICC, consistent with prior congressional actions emphasizing U.S. sovereignty and concerns about international judicial authority. The referral to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs aligns with the committee's jurisdiction over foreign policy matters. The resolution did not progress further and is recorded as failed or expired.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['May reinforce U.S. diplomatic stances and influence international negotiations related to the ICC.', 'Could affect perceptions of U.S. commitment to international criminal justice frameworks.', 'Might impact bilateral or multilateral cooperation on legal and human rights issues.']
The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits transparency and public understanding of the resolution's detailed content. As a non-binding resolution, it does not impose legal obligations but signals congressional sentiment. Tracking such resolutions is important to understand legislative priorities and their potential influence on foreign policy.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.