← Back to Bills
HRES 1354118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Impeaching Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Policy Area: Law
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Jan 17, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jul 10, 2024

Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

House Resolution 1354, introduced in the 118th Congress, is a resolution to impeach Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, on grounds of high crimes and misdemeanors. The resolution was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on July 10, 2024. No official summary or full text of the bill is publicly available, and the resolution ultimately failed or expired without further action.

Bottom Line

This resolution sought to initiate impeachment proceedings against a sitting Supreme Court Justice but did not advance beyond committee referral and expired without passage.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The resolution targets Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Jr. for impeachment on unspecified high crimes and misdemeanors.
  • It was introduced in the House of Representatives during the 118th Congress and referred to the House Judiciary Committee.
  • The resolution did not progress beyond referral and is recorded as failed or expired.
Who Benefits?

No direct beneficiaries are identifiable from the available information, as the resolution did not advance and lacks detailed provisions.

Potential Concerns

The absence of detailed text and summary limits understanding of the specific allegations and procedural mechanisms. Implementation considerations include the constitutional and procedural requirements for impeachment and potential impacts on judicial independence and court operations.

Political Context

Impeachment resolutions against Supreme Court Justices are rare and typically arise in contexts of significant controversy or allegations of misconduct. This resolution was introduced in the House and referred to the Judiciary Committee but did not proceed further, reflecting the procedural and political challenges inherent in Supreme Court impeachment efforts.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

The introduction of an impeachment resolution against a Supreme Court Justice may influence public discourse on judicial accountability and could affect the dynamics between the legislative and judicial branches. It may also set procedural precedents or influence future impeachment considerations.

GovScope Watchdog Notes

Transparency is limited due to the absence of a bill summary and full text, restricting public and legislative understanding of the specific grounds and evidence for impeachment. Oversight considerations include ensuring due process and adherence to constitutional standards in impeachment proceedings.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready