Finding that Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, is in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a certain subpoena.
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™House Resolution 1357 is a resolution from the 118th Congress that finds Merrick Garland, the Attorney General of the United States, in contempt of the House of Representatives for disobeying a subpoena issued by the House. The resolution was referred to the House Committee on Rules on July 11, 2024, but no further legislative action or full bill text is available. The resolution pertains to congressional oversight and enforcement authority over executive branch compliance with subpoenas.
H.Res. 1357 formally declares the Attorney General in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with a subpoena, but the resolution did not advance beyond referral and is currently failed or expired.
- The resolution targets Attorney General Merrick Garland for contempt of the House of Representatives.
- It is based on the Attorney General's alleged disobedience of a specific House subpoena.
- The resolution was referred to the House Committee on Rules but did not progress further.
['House of Representatives as an institution seeking to enforce subpoena authority', 'Members of Congress advocating for executive accountability']
['Lack of full bill text limits understanding of specific enforcement mechanisms or consequences', 'Potential challenges in enforcing contempt findings against executive branch officials', 'Unclear cost or resource implications due to absence of detailed provisions']
This resolution arises within the context of congressional oversight of the executive branch, specifically addressing compliance with subpoenas issued by the House. The referral to the Committee on Rules indicates procedural consideration but no further legislative action was taken, and the resolution ultimately failed or expired.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['May influence future congressional-executive branch interactions regarding subpoena compliance.', 'Could affect perceptions of congressional authority and executive accountability.', 'Potentially impacts legislative strategies for enforcing oversight.']
The lack of a full bill text and official summary limits comprehensive analysis and public transparency. The resolution's referral to the Committee on Rules without further action suggests procedural or political barriers. The absence of enforcement details raises questions about the practical impact of the contempt finding. Monitoring similar resolutions and their outcomes is important for understanding congressional oversight dynamics.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.
