← Back to Bills
HRES 1376118th CongressFailed / ExpiredHouse

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1371) strongly condemning the Biden Administration and its Border Czar, Kamala Harris's, failure to secure the United States border.

Policy Area: Congress
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
May 27, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jul 24, 2024

Latest Action

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

House Resolution 1376 is a procedural resolution providing for the consideration of House Resolution 1371, which strongly condemns the Biden Administration and Vice President Kamala Harris for what it describes as a failure to secure the United States border. The resolution itself does not contain substantive policy provisions but sets the terms under which the House will debate and vote on H. Res. 1371. The latest recorded action was a motion to reconsider that was laid on the table and agreed to without objection, indicating no further legislative action on this resolution. The bill is categorized under the policy area of Congress and has a status of failed or expired.

Bottom Line

H. Res. 1376 was a procedural measure related to debating a resolution critical of the Biden Administration's border security efforts, but it did not advance beyond initial consideration and is now expired.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill is a House resolution focused on the procedure for considering another resolution (H. Res. 1371) that condemns the Biden Administration's border security policies.
  • No substantive legislative text or policy changes are included in H. Res. 1376 itself.
  • The latest action was a motion to reconsider that was laid on the table without objection, effectively ending further action on this resolution.
Who Benefits?

['Members of the House of Representatives seeking to manage debate procedures', 'Political actors interested in framing or responding to border security discourse']

Potential Concerns

['As a procedural resolution, it does not address implementation or funding but may influence the legislative agenda and debate framing.', "The resolution's focus on condemning specific administration officials may contribute to partisan tensions within Congress."]

Political Context

This resolution was introduced in the 118th Congress in the House of Representatives and relates to the ongoing political debate over U.S. border security. It is procedural in nature, setting the terms for consideration of a resolution critical of the Biden Administration's border policies. The resolution did not advance and is now expired.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['By setting the terms for consideration of a politically charged resolution, the bill may influence the tone and focus of congressional debate on border security.', 'The procedural nature may affect legislative scheduling and priorities without enacting policy changes.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of substantive text limits detailed policy analysis. The resolution's explicit condemnation in its title highlights the importance of recognizing partisan framing in procedural bills. Transparency is maintained by clear record of actions and status, but the lack of policy content means oversight considerations focus on procedural fairness and debate management rather than implementation.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 90%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready