← Back to Bills
S 3596118th CongressFailed / ExpiredSenate

A bill to amend the Mineral Leasing Act to amend references of gilsonite to asphaltite.

Policy Area: Energy
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Mar 24, 2026
Latest Action Date
Nov 21, 2024

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 605.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress, proposes an amendment to the Mineral Leasing Act by changing all references from 'gilsonite' to 'asphaltite.' The bill does not include additional substantive provisions or changes beyond this terminology update. The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar but ultimately failed or expired without further legislative action. No detailed summary or full text is available to provide further context or implications.

Bottom Line

The bill seeks to update terminology in the Mineral Leasing Act by replacing 'gilsonite' with 'asphaltite,' but it did not advance through Congress and has expired.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to replace the term 'gilsonite' with 'asphaltite.'
  • No additional policy changes or provisions are included in the bill text or summary.
  • The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar but did not pass and is now expired.
Who Benefits?

['Government agencies responsible for mineral leasing and regulation, as the terminology update may clarify statutory language.', 'Industries involved in the extraction or use of asphaltite, if the terminology change aligns with current industry standards.']

Potential Concerns

['The absence of detailed legislative text and summary limits understanding of the full scope and impact of the terminology change.', 'Potential confusion or administrative burden during implementation if the terminology change is not uniformly adopted across related regulations and documents.', 'No information on cost, enforcement, or oversight implications is available.']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress and was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders but did not advance further. It is categorized under the Energy policy area and relates specifically to mineral leasing statutes. The lack of legislative movement suggests limited prioritization or consensus.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 1

GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

1 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Potential need for updates to related regulations, contracts, and administrative documents to reflect the terminology change.', "Possible clarification or confusion in legal and industry contexts depending on the acceptance and understanding of the term 'asphaltite' versus 'gilsonite.'"]

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits transparency and comprehensive analysis. The bill's failure to advance reduces immediate oversight concerns but highlights the importance of clear legislative documentation for terminology amendments that may affect regulatory frameworks.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready