End Judge Shopping Act
Latest Action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2710)
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™The End Judge Shopping Act is a Senate bill introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at addressing the practice known as 'judge shopping,' where parties in litigation seek to have their cases heard by a particular judge perceived as more favorable. The bill was read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No official summary or full text is available, limiting detailed analysis of its provisions.
This bill sought to regulate or eliminate judge shopping in the federal judiciary but did not advance beyond committee referral and expired without passage.
- The bill was introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress as S.4096.
- Its legislative progress ended after referral to the Senate Judiciary Committee with no further action.
- No official summary or full text is publicly available, restricting detailed understanding of its specific measures.
['Federal judiciary system, by potentially reducing forum manipulation.', 'Litigants seeking fair and impartial judicial assignment.', 'Legal professionals interested in consistent case assignment procedures.']
['Lack of publicly available full text and summary limits transparency and public understanding.', 'Unclear enforcement mechanisms or authority changes due to missing bill text.', 'Potential challenges in implementation without detailed provisions.']
The bill was introduced in the Senate and referred to the Judiciary Committee during the 118th Congress but did not progress further. The issue of judge shopping relates to judicial administration and fairness in case assignments, a topic of ongoing interest in legal reform discussions.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['If enacted, the bill could influence judicial case assignment procedures, potentially impacting court workload distribution.', "May affect litigation strategies by limiting parties' ability to select preferred judges.", 'Could prompt further legislative or administrative reforms in judicial administration.']
The absence of an official summary and full bill text restricts comprehensive transparency and oversight. Stakeholders and the public lack access to detailed provisions, enforcement mechanisms, and potential fiscal impacts, which are critical for informed evaluation and debate.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.