← Back to Bills
S 4473118th CongressFailed / ExpiredSenate

A bill to limit the definition of commercial in title 9, United States Code.

Policy Area: Law
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Jul 21, 2025
Latest Action Date
Jun 5, 2024

Latest Action

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This Senate bill from the 118th Congress proposes to limit the definition of "commercial" within Title 9 of the United States Code. Title 9 primarily governs arbitration and related legal procedures. The bill was read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No official summary or full text is available, limiting detailed analysis of the specific changes proposed to the definition of "commercial."

Bottom Line

The bill aimed to narrow the scope of what is considered "commercial" under Title 9, potentially affecting arbitration law, but it did not advance beyond committee referral and expired.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill seeks to amend the definition of "commercial" in Title 9 of the U.S. Code, which relates to arbitration.
  • It was introduced in the Senate and referred to the Judiciary Committee but did not progress further.
  • No official summary or full text is publicly available, restricting detailed understanding of the bill's provisions.
Who Benefits?

['Parties involved in arbitration under Title 9 who may be affected by a narrower definition of "commercial."', 'Legal practitioners and courts interpreting arbitration law.', 'Businesses and individuals engaged in commercial arbitration potentially impacted by definitional changes.']

Potential Concerns

["Lack of publicly available full text and official summary limits transparency and understanding of the bill's precise effects.", 'Changes to the definition of "commercial" could create uncertainty or require adjustments in arbitration practices.', 'Potential challenges in implementation and enforcement due to ambiguity without detailed legislative language.']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It did not advance beyond this stage and is classified as failed or expired. The policy area is law, specifically arbitration under Title 9 of the U.S. Code. No further legislative actions or debates are recorded.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['A narrower definition of "commercial" could reduce the scope of arbitration applicability, potentially increasing litigation in courts.', 'Businesses may need to reassess arbitration clauses in contracts to ensure compliance with the revised definition if enacted.', 'Courts and arbitrators might face increased interpretive challenges during transition to a new definitional standard.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

Transparency is limited due to the absence of the bill's full text and official summary, which are critical for comprehensive public and legislative scrutiny. The bill's failure to progress past committee referral further restricts available information on legislative intent and potential impacts. Monitoring similar future proposals would benefit from improved documentation and disclosure.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 60%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready