← Back to Bills
S 5022118th CongressFailed / ExpiredSenate

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, as the "John Mercer Langston Post Office Building."

Policy Area: Government Operations and Politics
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Aug 13, 2025
Latest Action Date
Sep 11, 2024

Latest Action

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

Senate Bill 5022 from the 118th Congress proposes to designate the United States Postal Service facility located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, as the "John Mercer Langston Post Office Building." The bill does not include additional provisions, funding details, or policy changes beyond the naming designation. The latest recorded action was the bill being read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The bill status is noted as failed or expired, indicating it did not advance to enactment during the legislative session.

Bottom Line

This bill sought to rename a specific USPS facility in Petersburg, Virginia, but did not advance beyond committee referral and ultimately expired without becoming law.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill designates a USPS facility at 29 Franklin Street, Petersburg, Virginia, as the "John Mercer Langston Post Office Building."
  • No additional legislative provisions, funding authorizations, or policy changes are included in the bill text.
  • The bill was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs but did not progress further and expired.
Who Benefits?

['United States Postal Service as the facility is renamed', 'Local community in Petersburg, Virginia, through recognition of John Mercer Langston', 'Historians and civic groups interested in commemorative namings']

Potential Concerns

['No specific implementation or funding details are provided, but renaming federal facilities typically involves administrative costs.', "The bill's failure to advance means no formal change occurred, which may affect local expectations or planning.", 'No oversight or enforcement mechanisms are included, as the bill is limited to a naming designation.']

Political Context

Naming federal buildings after notable individuals is a common congressional practice to honor historical figures. Such bills are typically non-controversial and symbolic. Referral to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs is standard for USPS-related legislation. The bill's failure to advance may reflect legislative priorities or timing rather than opposition to the naming itself.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 1

GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

1 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['The renaming may enhance local historical recognition and community identity in Petersburg, Virginia.', 'Could set a precedent for future USPS facility namings in the region or nationally.', 'May require USPS to update official records, signage, and communications to reflect the new name.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The bill lacks detailed text and funding information, limiting transparency on implementation costs or administrative responsibilities. The failure to advance means no formal oversight or reporting on the renaming process occurred. Monitoring similar future bills could benefit from clearer provisions on cost and administrative impact.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 90%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready