A bill to provide for the use of capability-based analysis of price of goods or services offered by nontraditional defense contractors.
Latest Action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Official Summary
Official summary has not been imported yet.
GovScope Watchdog™
AI Government Intelligence™This Senate bill, introduced in the 118th Congress, proposes the use of capability-based analysis to evaluate the price of goods or services offered by nontraditional defense contractors. The bill aims to provide a framework for assessing pricing in defense procurement from contractors who do not fall under traditional defense contracting categories. The bill was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services but ultimately failed or expired without further action. No official summary or full text is available to provide detailed provisions or mechanisms.
The bill sought to introduce capability-based pricing analysis for nontraditional defense contractors but did not advance beyond committee referral and expired.
- Focuses on pricing analysis methods for goods or services from nontraditional defense contractors.
- Referred to the Senate Committee on Armed Services after initial readings.
- Did not progress to enactment and is currently classified as failed or expired.
['Nontraditional defense contractors who provide goods or services to the Department of Defense', 'Department of Defense procurement officials involved in contractor price evaluation', 'Potentially, the defense industry sectors engaging with emerging or innovative suppliers']
['Lack of detailed provisions or full text limits understanding of implementation and oversight mechanisms', 'Potential challenges in defining and standardizing capability-based price analysis criteria', 'Unclear cost implications or resource requirements for applying new pricing analysis methods', 'No information on enforcement or accountability measures']
The bill was introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. It addresses procurement practices related to nontraditional defense contractors, a topic relevant to defense acquisition reform and innovation. The bill did not advance beyond committee referral and expired, indicating limited legislative momentum or prioritization during the session.
Hidden impact flags detected: 2
GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.
['Potential encouragement of innovation in defense contracting by providing alternative pricing evaluation methods', 'Possible shifts in procurement practices that could affect traditional defense contractors', 'Increased administrative burden on procurement officials if new analysis methods require additional training or resources']
The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits transparency and public understanding of the bill's specific provisions and mechanisms. Oversight bodies and stakeholders would need detailed legislative language to assess the bill's impact on defense procurement processes and contractor evaluation. The bill's failure to advance also highlights the importance of tracking legislative progress to understand policy priorities and outcomes.
GovScope Intelligence Roadmap
Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.