← Back to Bills
S 5575118th CongressFailed / ExpiredSenate

A bill to designate the Patsye Crites Forest.

Policy Area: Public Lands and Natural Resources
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Aug 13, 2025
Latest Action Date
Dec 18, 2024

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This bill, introduced in the 118th Congress as Senate Bill 5575, proposes the designation of a specific area as the Patsye Crites Forest. The bill falls under the policy area of Public Lands and Natural Resources. However, no detailed summary or full text of the bill is available, and the bill was held at the desk as of December 18, 2024, with a status of failed or expired. The designation likely involves naming or officially recognizing a forest area, which typically involves federal land management agencies.

Bottom Line

Senate Bill 5575 aimed to designate the Patsye Crites Forest but did not advance beyond being held at the desk and ultimately expired without passage.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill seeks to designate a forest area named Patsye Crites Forest.
  • It is categorized under Public Lands and Natural Resources policy area.
  • The bill was introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress but failed to progress and expired.
Who Benefits?

['Federal land management agencies responsible for the designated forest area', "Local communities and stakeholders interested in the forest's recognition", 'Environmental and conservation organizations focused on public lands']

Potential Concerns

['Lack of detailed bill text and summary limits understanding of specific provisions and implications.', 'No information on funding or management responsibilities for the designated forest area.', 'Potential administrative or oversight challenges related to the designation process are unknown.']

Political Context

The bill was introduced in the Senate during the 118th Congress but was held at the desk and did not advance, resulting in its expiration. The lack of further legislative action suggests limited prioritization or consensus on this designation during the session.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Official designation of the Patsye Crites Forest could increase public awareness and potentially promote conservation efforts in the area.', 'Designation might influence local land use planning and tourism activities related to the forest.', 'Federal agencies may need to allocate resources for signage, management, or maintenance associated with the new designation.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of a full bill text and official summary limits the ability to fully assess the bill's scope, provisions, and potential impacts. Transparency is reduced when key legislative documents are unavailable, which can hinder public understanding and oversight. Additionally, the bill's failure to progress beyond being held at the desk suggests limited legislative momentum or prioritization.

Passage Likelihood: LowConfidence: 70%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready