← Back to Bills
HR 6021119th CongressIntroducedHouse

Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Amendment Act

Policy Area: Native Americans
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
House
Last Updated
Jul 23, 2026
Latest Action Date
Jul 22, 2026

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

Official Summary

Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Amendment Act This bill states that nothing in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA) prohibits possessing, selling, bartering, purchasing, shipping, or transporting any authentic Alaska Native handicraft, clothing, or art on the basis that it contains a nonedible migratory bird part, so long as the bird was not taken in a wasteful or illegal manner. (The MBTA implements four international treaties that the United States entered into with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia. The MBTA prohibits the taking of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization.) The bill directs the Department of State to work with the Department of the Interior to enter into appropriate bilateral procedures with countries that are parties to the treaties under the MBTA to clarify the treatment of Alaska Native handicraft containing nonedible migratory bird parts from the species of migratory birds listed in those treaties. Further, Interior must modify any regulations implementing the MBTA to implement this bill.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

The Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Amendment Act modifies the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 by exempting authentic Alaska Native handicrafts, clothing, or art containing nonedible migratory bird parts from prohibitions on possession, sale, barter, purchase, shipping, or transportation, provided the birds were not taken wastefully or illegally. The bill requires the Department of State to collaborate with the Department of the Interior to establish bilateral procedures with treaty partner countries to clarify the treatment of such handicrafts. Additionally, the Department of the Interior must update regulations implementing the MBTA to reflect these changes.

Bottom Line

This bill creates an exemption under the MBTA for Alaska Native handicrafts containing nonedible migratory bird parts and mandates interagency and international coordination to implement this exemption.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • Exempts authentic Alaska Native handicrafts containing nonedible migratory bird parts from MBTA prohibitions if the birds were legally and non-wastefully taken.
  • Directs the Department of State and Department of the Interior to establish bilateral procedures with treaty countries to clarify treatment of these handicrafts.
  • Requires the Department of the Interior to modify MBTA regulations to implement the bill's provisions.
Who Benefits?

['Alaska Native artisans and communities producing handicrafts, clothing, or art containing migratory bird parts', 'Department of State and Department of the Interior through clarified regulatory and treaty implementation responsibilities', 'International treaty partner countries involved in MBTA agreements']

Potential Concerns

['The need for effective interagency coordination and international agreement may delay implementation.', 'Modifying MBTA regulations could require administrative resources and oversight to ensure compliance with the new exemption.', 'Potential challenges in verifying that bird parts were not taken wastefully or illegally could complicate enforcement.']

Political Context

The bill amends the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, which implements international treaties with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia to protect migratory bird species. It addresses a specific exemption for Alaska Native cultural practices involving migratory bird parts, reflecting ongoing legislative attention to Native American and indigenous rights within federal wildlife protection laws. The bill was ordered to be reported in the nature of a substitute by unanimous consent, indicating bipartisan procedural support as of July 2026.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Potential increased economic opportunities for Alaska Native artisans due to clarified legal protections for handicrafts containing migratory bird parts.', 'Possible administrative burden on federal agencies to negotiate international agreements and update regulations.', 'Enhanced clarity in international treaty implementation regarding indigenous cultural practices.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The bill involves interagency coordination and international treaty negotiations, which may require transparent reporting on progress and outcomes. Regulatory changes by the Department of the Interior should be subject to public notice and comment to ensure stakeholder input. Oversight mechanisms may be needed to verify compliance with the exemption conditions, particularly regarding the lawful and non-wasteful taking of migratory birds.

Passage Likelihood: MediumConfidence: 85%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready