← Back to Bills
S 1003119th CongressIntroducedSenate

Lulu’s Law

Policy Area: Science, Technology, Communications
View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Jul 30, 2026
Latest Action Date
Jun 26, 2026

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 119-100.

Official Summary

Lulu’s Law This act requires the Federal Communications Commission to issue an order explicitly permitting the transmission of wireless emergency alerts to mobile phones in the event of a shark attack. (Under current regulations, authorized government authorities are permitted to send wireless emergency alerts regarding public safety emergencies, including severe weather, missing children, and other threats to life or property.)

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

Lulu's Law mandates that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) explicitly authorize the use of wireless emergency alerts (WEAs) to notify the public about shark attacks. Currently, WEAs can be sent for various public safety emergencies such as severe weather and missing children, but this law specifically includes shark attacks as a permissible alert category. The law became Public Law No: 119-100 on June 26, 2026, and falls under the policy area of Science, Technology, and Communications.

Bottom Line

Lulu's Law expands the scope of wireless emergency alerts to include shark attacks, requiring the FCC to formally permit such alerts to mobile phones.

Policy Risk Level
🟢 Low
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • Requires the FCC to issue an order explicitly allowing wireless emergency alerts for shark attacks.
  • Builds on existing regulations that permit alerts for public safety emergencies like severe weather and missing children.
  • The law was enacted and became Public Law No: 119-100 on June 26, 2026.
Who Benefits?

['General public, especially coastal communities and beachgoers', 'Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as the regulatory authority', 'Emergency management agencies and local governments responsible for public safety']

Potential Concerns

['Implementation challenges in defining criteria and protocols for issuing shark attack alerts', 'Potential costs related to updating alert systems and public communication strategies', 'Oversight and authority considerations regarding the scope and frequency of such alerts']

Political Context

The bill was introduced and passed in the 119th Congress, reflecting an interest in expanding public safety communications through wireless emergency alerts. It aligns with existing federal emergency alert frameworks but adds a new category specific to shark attacks, indicating a legislative focus on enhancing public safety in coastal areas.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 1

GovScope reviewed 1 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

1 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Increased public awareness and preparedness for shark attacks in coastal regions.', 'Potential for increased demand on emergency alert infrastructure to accommodate new alert types.', 'Possible influence on other jurisdictions or agencies to consider similar alert expansions for localized threats.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The bill's text was not provided, limiting detailed analysis of specific provisions or enforcement mechanisms. Oversight should focus on how the FCC implements the new alert category, including criteria for issuing alerts and managing alert frequency to avoid public desensitization. Transparency in the FCC's rulemaking and alert issuance processes will be important for public trust.

Passage Likelihood: HighConfidence: 90%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready