← Back to Bills
S 446119th CongressReportedSenate

A bill to prohibit Big Cypress National Preserve from being designated as wilderness or as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes.

View on Congress.gov
Origin Chamber
Senate
Last Updated
Mar 24, 2026
Latest Action Date
Feb 4, 2026

Latest Action

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably and an amendment to the title.

Official Summary

Official summary has not been imported yet.

GovScope Watchdog™

AI Government Intelligence™
Executive Summary

This Senate bill (S.446) from the 119th Congress proposes to prohibit the designation of Big Cypress National Preserve as wilderness or as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System. The bill is currently under consideration by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, which has ordered it to be reported favorably with amendments. No official summary or full text is publicly available, limiting detailed analysis of specific provisions or implications.

Bottom Line

S.446 seeks to prevent Big Cypress National Preserve from receiving wilderness status, affecting its management and potential protections under the National Wilderness Preservation System.

Policy Risk Level
🟡 Medium
Neutral Risk Assessment
Key Points
  • The bill explicitly prohibits Big Cypress National Preserve from being designated as wilderness or included in the National Wilderness Preservation System.
  • The bill is currently in committee with a favorable report including amendments, indicating active legislative consideration.
  • No official summary or full bill text is available, restricting detailed understanding of the bill's scope or additional provisions.
Who Benefits?

['Federal land management agencies responsible for Big Cypress National Preserve', 'Stakeholders interested in maintaining current land use and management practices at Big Cypress', 'Potentially local communities and industries affected by wilderness designation restrictions']

Potential Concerns

["Lack of publicly available full text and summary limits transparency and comprehensive evaluation of the bill's impacts.", 'Prohibiting wilderness designation may affect long-term conservation and land management strategies.', 'Amendments to the bill and title may introduce additional provisions requiring further review.']

Political Context

The bill is part of ongoing legislative activity in the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. It reflects a specific policy decision regarding the status of Big Cypress National Preserve within federal land management frameworks. The absence of a summary and full text suggests the bill is in an early or evolving stage of the legislative process.

Hidden Impact Review

Hidden impact flags detected: 2

GovScope reviewed 2 policy-risk categories. Hover for a quick definition. Click detected flags for bill-specific details.

2 Detected
Detected Flags
Indirect Effects

['Maintaining Big Cypress National Preserve outside the National Wilderness Preservation System could influence future land use decisions, recreational access, and environmental conservation efforts.', 'Local economic activities dependent on land use flexibility may be indirectly supported by the prohibition of wilderness designation.']

GovScope Watchdog Notes

The absence of an official summary and full bill text highlights a transparency gap that complicates public and stakeholder understanding. Monitoring amendments and committee reports will be important for assessing the bill's full implications. Oversight should focus on how the prohibition on wilderness designation aligns with broader federal land management policies and environmental goals.

Passage Likelihood: UnknownConfidence: 60%Model: gpt-4.1-mini

GovScope Intelligence Roadmap

Future bill intelligence will connect sponsors, committee referrals, related votes, campaign finance, disclosures, and stock trades into one legislative intelligence view.

Enterprise Ready